ACCESSIBILITY SERVICES
Fix accessibility at the source.
We implement or support the technical fixes — semantic HTML, keyboard interaction, focus management, forms, ARIA and dynamic behavior — then retest against the evidence that created each issue, within the agreed scope.
The problem this solves
A report is only useful when a team can act on it. We either guide your developers or implement the code-level fixes directly — semantic HTML, keyboard interaction, focus management, forms, ARIA and dynamic behavior — bridging issue documentation, frontend implementation and QA verification within the agreed scope.
Who needs this
Teams with an existing audit backlog
Scope, evidence and recommendations are adapted to this context.
Engineering teams fixing components or CMS templates
Scope, evidence and recommendations are adapted to this context.
Agencies preparing a site for handoff
Scope, evidence and recommendations are adapted to this context.
Product teams that need retesting after a release
Scope, evidence and recommendations are adapted to this context.
What we evaluate
Remediation planning and grouping by root cause
Tested with native semantics, keyboard behavior, responsive states and assistive technology where appropriate.
Frontend code review and implementation guidance
Tested with native semantics, keyboard behavior, responsive states and assistive technology where appropriate.
Component and design system fixes
Tested with native semantics, keyboard behavior, responsive states and assistive technology where appropriate.
CMS templates, plugin output and authoring workflows
Tested with native semantics, keyboard behavior, responsive states and assistive technology where appropriate.
Retesting against original evidence
Tested with native semantics, keyboard behavior, responsive states and assistive technology where appropriate.
Technical examples
Replace div buttons with native buttons
Findings include evidence, impact, fix guidance and verification steps.
Repair form labels, error associations and status regions
Findings include evidence, impact, fix guidance and verification steps.
Restore focus visibility without disrupting visual design
Findings include evidence, impact, fix guidance and verification steps.
Refactor custom widgets to match expected keyboard patterns
Findings include evidence, impact, fix guidance and verification steps.
Methodology
Test
Define scope and evaluate representative workflows.
Find
Record barriers with reproducible evidence.
Explain
Connect issues to user impact and technical criteria.
Fix
Recommend source-level remediation.
Verify
Retest fixes and update status.
Deliverables
Prioritized remediation plan
Prepared for product, design, engineering and QA conversations.
Developer notes and code-level recommendations
Prepared for product, design, engineering and QA conversations.
Review of fixed components or templates
Prepared for product, design, engineering and QA conversations.
Retest status for resolved, partial and open findings
Prepared for product, design, engineering and QA conversations.
FAQ
Do you guarantee perfect compliance?
No. We provide technical accessibility remediation and verification, not a guarantee of legal compliance or permanent conformance.
Can you work with our developers?
Yes. The goal is to make fixes understandable and testable inside your normal workflow.
Can you remediate WordPress?
Yes, when the issue source is theme, block, template, plugin output, content or custom code within the agreed scope.
Audit, fix, verify.
Tell us about your website or application, the scope and your accessibility goals. We'll recommend an approach — audit only, or audit plus remediation — and send a written proposal.