ACCESSIBILITY SERVICES
Understand what assistive technology users actually hear.
Representative screen reader testing for names, roles, announcements, forms, dialogs, navigation and dynamic updates.
The problem this solves
Many issues are invisible in markup alone. Screen reader testing reveals whether controls are named, state changes are announced, forms are understandable and navigation makes sense.
Who needs this
Teams validating critical workflows
Scope, evidence and recommendations are adapted to this context.
Products with dialogs, live updates or custom widgets
Scope, evidence and recommendations are adapted to this context.
Organizations checking remediation quality
Scope, evidence and recommendations are adapted to this context.
Vendors preparing procurement documentation
Scope, evidence and recommendations are adapted to this context.
What we evaluate
Roles, names, states and values
Tested with native semantics, keyboard behavior, responsive states and assistive technology where appropriate.
Headings, landmarks and navigation
Tested with native semantics, keyboard behavior, responsive states and assistive technology where appropriate.
Forms, instructions and errors
Tested with native semantics, keyboard behavior, responsive states and assistive technology where appropriate.
Dialogs and focus movement
Tested with native semantics, keyboard behavior, responsive states and assistive technology where appropriate.
Live regions and dynamic updates
Tested with native semantics, keyboard behavior, responsive states and assistive technology where appropriate.
Technical examples
NVDA with Firefox or Chrome
Findings include evidence, impact, fix guidance and verification steps.
VoiceOver with Safari
Findings include evidence, impact, fix guidance and verification steps.
Mobile pairings when in scope
Findings include evidence, impact, fix guidance and verification steps.
Workflow notes instead of one-off announcements
Findings include evidence, impact, fix guidance and verification steps.
Methodology
Test
Define scope and evaluate representative workflows.
Find
Record barriers with reproducible evidence.
Explain
Connect issues to user impact and technical criteria.
Fix
Recommend source-level remediation.
Verify
Retest fixes and update status.
Deliverables
Screen reader test notes
Prepared for product, design, engineering and QA conversations.
Findings with reproduction steps and expected announcement
Prepared for product, design, engineering and QA conversations.
Remediation guidance
Prepared for product, design, engineering and QA conversations.
Limitations and recommended follow-up testing
Prepared for product, design, engineering and QA conversations.
FAQ
Does one screen reader prove universal accessibility?
No. A single pairing cannot represent every user, browser or assistive technology combination.
Do you test JAWS?
JAWS can be included when required by the scope and available test setup.
Is screen reader testing enough?
No. Keyboard, visual, cognitive, low-vision and semantic issues also need evaluation.
Audit, fix, verify.
Tell us about your website or application, the scope and your accessibility goals. We'll recommend an approach — audit only, or audit plus remediation — and send a written proposal.