ACCESSIBILITY SERVICES
Keep accessibility from regressing after release.
Release checks, component review and periodic sampling for teams that ship continuously and need accessibility evidence over time.
The problem this solves
After remediation, teams still ship new components, flows and content. Ongoing QA gives recurring evidence without pretending automated monitoring can replace manual testing.
Who needs this
Teams with frequent releases
Scope, evidence and recommendations are adapted to this context.
Design system and component library owners
Scope, evidence and recommendations are adapted to this context.
Products after a remediation cycle
Scope, evidence and recommendations are adapted to this context.
Agencies maintaining client sites
Scope, evidence and recommendations are adapted to this context.
What we evaluate
Release checks
Tested with native semantics, keyboard behavior, responsive states and assistive technology where appropriate.
Regression testing of critical workflows
Tested with native semantics, keyboard behavior, responsive states and assistive technology where appropriate.
Component review
Tested with native semantics, keyboard behavior, responsive states and assistive technology where appropriate.
Periodic sampling
Tested with native semantics, keyboard behavior, responsive states and assistive technology where appropriate.
Design system changes and developer collaboration
Tested with native semantics, keyboard behavior, responsive states and assistive technology where appropriate.
Technical examples
Focus regression after component changes
Findings include evidence, impact, fix guidance and verification steps.
Form validation behavior after backend updates
Findings include evidence, impact, fix guidance and verification steps.
Dialog and menu keyboard patterns
Findings include evidence, impact, fix guidance and verification steps.
Responsive and zoom checks for changed templates
Findings include evidence, impact, fix guidance and verification steps.
Methodology
Test
Define scope and evaluate representative workflows.
Find
Record barriers with reproducible evidence.
Explain
Connect issues to user impact and technical criteria.
Fix
Recommend source-level remediation.
Verify
Retest fixes and update status.
Deliverables
QA notes by release or period
Prepared for product, design, engineering and QA conversations.
Regression findings with status
Prepared for product, design, engineering and QA conversations.
Component guidance
Prepared for product, design, engineering and QA conversations.
Escalation recommendations when a full audit is needed
Prepared for product, design, engineering and QA conversations.
Related resources
Accessibility vs. compliance
Why passing a deadline is not the end of the work.
After a deadline passes
A technical workflow for auditing, remediating, verifying and documenting.
FAQ
Is this automated monitoring?
No. Automated checks can support the process, but ongoing QA includes manual testing and technical review.
How often should QA run?
That depends on release cadence and risk. Many teams start with critical workflow checks around major releases.
Can it replace a full audit?
No. It helps maintain accessibility between deeper audits.
Audit, fix, verify.
Tell us about your website or application, the scope and your accessibility goals. We'll recommend an approach — audit only, or audit plus remediation — and send a written proposal.